Tis said it\u2019s hypothetical
\nLow doses don\u2019t amount
\nTo much, that\u2019s what it\u2019s often said
\nLow doses do not count
\nBut this mis-information
\nIs tragically now floored
\nSo needs investigation
\nFor facts can\u2019t be ignored<\/p>\n
Skolnick said in 95
\nAnd Hulka too, the same
\nBackground radiation
\nMight appear too tame
\nBut coupled with the under mineralisation
\nOf our food
\nIt becomes more serious
\nAnd needs, however crude
\nIt must really then be looked at
\nFor everybody may
\nBe exposed, yes everyone
\nEvery single day<\/p>\n
That there is now no safe dose
\nNo threshold dose let\u2019s say
\nMeaning cancer could become
\nMore rampant every day
\nSo more genetic molecules
\nWill damage single cells
\nTurning them malignant
\nNot hearing alarm bells
\nIonising radiation hits our DNa
\nOur double helix gets it
\nAnd then of course we pay.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Tis said it\u2019s hypothetical Low doses don\u2019t amount To much, that\u2019s what it\u2019s often said Low doses do not count But this mis-information Is tragically now floored So needs investigation For facts can\u2019t be ignored Skolnick said in 95 And … Continue reading