Methyl Iodide is yet more arrogance
\nMan’s belief that in essence that he can do
\nAnything that Nature does
\nThough this is really just a buzz
\nInside his head, because he’s clueless to
\nSea Vegetables give off this under oceans
\nBut synthesized by Chemists its not on
\nIt becomes, a DNA changing, fumigant
\nAnd to call it “Midas” somehow that a con
\nPerhaps its lucrative but then so many things,
\nAre lucrative, but the essence really here
\nIs to change whatever it touches into the purest gold
\nAnd infact, apparently its more like fear
\nIt abounds in negative energy for its dangerous, when its used Rodale and Panna say they,
\nwon’t sleep content in their beds till it has been banned
\nand really there is not a lot more to say
\nbecause on strawberries its really the chosen one
\nReplacing Methyl Bromide to be sure
\nAnd hopefully it will be banned before too long
\nIt will not be injected into soil no more.
\nTo me though there’s a fundamental problem
\nSomething going wrong at the approval stage
\nToo many nasty chemicals seem to get the nod
\nAnd then a battle rages for a an age
\nTo somehow keep this stuff out of the sod
\nPerhaps approvals,are not as good as they ought to be
\nthe trials are not as accurate as we hoped
\nOr could there be another reason why<\/p>\n
because if its as stringent as everyone makes out<\/p>\n
why is it that the errors appear high.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Over the years quite a number of medicines and pharmceuticals have been approved only to later be banned what is wrong with the approval stage is it not as good as it might be? Continue reading